TalkOakland
  • Overview
  • Work
  • Press

Appropriation within the Diaspora

9/1/2017

2 Comments

 
Docuseries
Part 4 of 4 | See Previous Post
In the United States, Africans aren't Black.

Black Americans and Africans are two distinctly different groups. It's difficult for people to understand this because of our shared complexion and origin, but Black Americans are their own people.

Black Americans have an experience in the United States that is specific to the transatlantic slave trade, not their origin in Africa. But African immigrants and first generation Africans have an identity outside of US slavery - especially because they have the privilege of knowing what country in Africa that they originated from. ​
Africans have the power to appropriate Black American culture. Africans can vacillate between accessing their African culture to identifying as  "Black" - a group that lacks that ancestral relationship. Africans are able to appropriate the Black American struggle because we look like one another. But our history and experience in America is not the same.

The subjugation of Black Americans has been engrained in society for generations. Black Americans are not respected as having their own culture that they have exclusive access to. Instead, people take from it as they feel inspired to. But that is not supportive, that is destructive.

The relationship between Africans and Black Americans is complex. There are Black Americans who identity as Africans. And again, for them, that is valid. Black Americans reclaiming their lineage to Africa should be supported. They do not have the social or political power to appropriate African culture. But not all Black Americans share that same sentiment. And who they are in this world should be equally respected - especially when "Black" is the only identity that they have.

​
Africans experience oppression. But it is not the same oppression stemming from Black America's unique history to the transatlantic slave trade. After that pivotal point in US history, Black Americans developed their own identity and culture. It was not African. And Africans can support Black Americans by understanding their unique identity and history, not blindly feeling access to their culture because of their shared complexion. 

If it is increasingly popular to highlight diversity, it is imperative we maintain that within the African diaspora. If we allow everyone access to the Black identity, that negates the experience of those who who most vividly experience that identity - and often die because of it. "Black" should not be an umbrella term that everyone with African ancestry identifies as. Black should be reserved for Black Americans - because that is the only identity that they have.

Picture
SANTA RITA JAIL
Picture
THE TRAP
2 Comments
Sue Elle
9/17/2017 07:24:26 pm

What the hell? All people of predominately Sub-Saharan African descent are black. They are confusing race with ethnicity. Black is the race. African American is the ethnicity. People need to educate themselves before trying to educate others. This is so simple, guys:

Race: Black
Ethnicity: African American
Nationality: American

It's like 1, 2, 3.

Just like, for example, and Nigerian Igbo person is:

Race: Black
Ethnicity: Igbo
Nationality: Nigerian

And you can't really talk about the slave trade and exclude Africa from it (specifically West, Central, and Southeast Africa via Mozambique and Madagascar). It didn't start on a ship in the Atlantic.

Reply
Kim
9/18/2017 04:41:00 pm

Black people claim Black as their ethnicity. We do not know where we originated from. Also, as Black people, what we're referred to is always changing. We've been called "Negros", "Colored People", "African Americans", etc. But in the community that I live in, we predominantly refer to ourselves as Black - a term that embodies both our culture and race. How we identify, and how we see others, does not have to align with your academic definition of how these terms should be applied. These words are incredibly fluid - and carry connotations that override denotations. In all, the purpose of this post was to shed light on the fact that there are Black people (African-Americans, by your definition) who do not want to be categorized in the same group as Africans because they do not relate to them as being one with us. That sentiment is valid. Your focus should not be on scrutinizing words, but understanding that perspective.

Furthermore, obviously Africa played a role in transatlantic slave trade. But within the US, generations after, they didn't suffer the same consequences. They don't experience the same engrained racism that Black Americans are subjected to. Africans are respected for having culture - a rich history that isn't based on the slave trade. For Black Americans, our identities, whether we want to agree with that or not, stem from that point in history. That's where we originated from - and we face the consequences of that legacy today.

Again, Africans face oppression. But it is different from ours. I wouldn't try to identify with cannibalism in Liberia. That is not my reality. But we can recognize our differences in order to unite without appropriating other people's experiences.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Docuseries
    Editorials
    Music
    Narratives
    Science
    Top Posts

© 2019 TalkOakland | All Rights Reserved
  • Overview
  • Work
  • Press